Introduction: Opening Governance – Change, Continuity and Conceptual Ambiguity

Rosie McGee, Duncan Edwards
Volume 47 Issue 1
Published: 24 January 2016

Open government and open data are new areas of research, advocacy and activism that have entered the governance field alongside the more established areas of transparency and accountability. This article reviews recent scholarship in these areas, pinpointing contributions to more open, transparent, accountable and responsive governance via improved practice, projects and programmes. The authors set the rest of the articles from this IDS Bulletin in the context of the ideas, relationships, processes, behaviours, policy frameworks and aid funding practices of the last five years, and critically discuss questions and weaknesses that limit the effectiveness and impact of this work. Identifying conceptual ambiguity as a key problem, they offer a series of definitions to help overcome the technical and political difficulties this causes. They also identify hype and euphemism, and offer a series of conclusions to help restore meaning and ideological content to work on open government and open data in transparent and accountable governance. 



From Issue: Vol 47, No 1 (2016) | Opening Governance


Avila, R.; Feigenblatt, H.; Heacock, R. and Heller, N. (2010) Global Mapping of Technology for Transparency and Accountability, London: Transparency & Accountability Initiative,­content/uploads/2011/05/global_mapping_of_technology_final.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015)

Bates, J. (2012) ' "This is What Modern Deregulation Looks Like": Co-optation and Contestation in the Shaping of the UK's Open Government Data Initiative', Journal of Community Informatics 8.2, view/845/916Retrieved (accessed 15 December 2015)

Brennan, K. (2015) The Uses and Abuses of Buzzwords for Open Government, 12 August,­open-government/ (accessed 15 December 2015)

Calland, R. (2010) 'Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives, Annex 3: Freedom of Information', prepared for the Transparency and Accountability Initiative workshop, Institute of Development Studies, 14–15 October 2010,­content/uploads/2011/05/impacts_annex3_final1.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015)

Carothers, T. and Brechenmacher, S. (2014) 'Accountability, Transparency, Participation, and Inclusion: A New Development Consensus?', Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,­transparency-participation-and-inclusion-new-development­consensus (accessed 15 December 2015)

Chandhoke, N. (2007) 'Civil Society', Development in Practice 17.4–5, (accessed 15 December 2015)

Cornwall, A. (2010) 'Introductory Overview: Buzzwords and Fozzwords: Deconstructing Development Discourse', in A. Cornwall and D. Eade (eds), Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords, Rugby: Practical Action/Oxfam GB, (accessed 11 December 2015)

Cornwall, A. and Brock, K. (2015) 'What do Buzzwords do for Development Policy? A Critical Look at "Participation", "Empowerment" and "Poverty Reduction"', Third World Quarterly 26.7: 1043–60, abs/10.1080/01436590500235603 (accessed 15 December 2015)

Cornwall, A. and Eade, D. (2010) Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords, Rugby: Practical Action/Oxfam,­development-buzzwords.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015)

Davies, T.G. and Bawa, Z.A. (2012) 'The Promises and Perils of Open Government Data (OGD)', Journal of Community Informatics 8.2, (accessed 15 December 2015)

de Gramont, D. (2014) 'Beyond Magic Bullets in Governance Reform', Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,­in-governance-reform (accessed 15 December 2015)

Eade, D. (2010) 'Preface', in A. Cornwall and D. Eade (eds), Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords, Rugby: Practical Action/ Oxfam GB,­development-buzzwords.pdf (accessed 11 December 2015)

Fox, J. (2014) Social Accountability: What does the Evidence Really Say?, Global Partnership for Social Accountability Working Paper 1, Washington DC: World Bank,­content/uploads/2015/04/Social-Accountability-What-Does­Evidence-Really-Say-GPSA-Working-Paper-1-with-Foreword.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015)

Fox, Jonathan (2007) 'The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability', Development in Practice 17.4: 663–71, (accessed 15 December 2015)

Gallie, W.B. (1956) 'Essentially Contested Concepts', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98, scan_tab_contents (accessed 15 December 2015)

Goetz, A. and Jenkins, R. (2005) 'Introduction', in A. Goetz and R. Jenkins (eds), Reinventing Accountability: Making Democracy Work for Human Development, New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan

Gurstein, M.B. (2011) 'Open Data: Empowering the Empowered or Effective Data Use for Everyone?', First Monday 16.2, (accessed 15 December 2015)

Heusser, F. (2012) Understanding Open Government Data and Addressing its Impact, OPENDATAPAPER_DRAFT_VERSION.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015)

Howell, J. and Lind, J. (2009) 'Manufacturing Civil Society and the Limits of Legitimacy: Aid, Security and Civil Society After 9/11 in Afghanistan', European Journal of Development Research 21: 718–36, (accessed 15 December 2015)

Khan, S. and Foti, J. (2015) Aligning Supply and Demand for Better Governance: Open Data in the Open Government Partnership, Washington DC: OGP Independent Reporting Mechanism, IRMReport-OpenData.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015

Lewis, D. (2002) 'Civil Society in African Contexts: Reflections on the Usefulness of a Concept', Development and Change 33: 569–86, (accessed 15 December 2015)

McAdam, D.; Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2001) Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

McGee, R. and Carlitz, R. (2013) Learning Study on 'The Users' in Technology for Transparency and Accountabilty Initiatives: Assumptions and Realities, Hivos Knowledge Programme, handle/123456789/3179/IDS-UserLearningStudyonT4T&AIs. pdf ?sequence=1 (accessed 15 December 2015)

McGee, R. and Gaventa, J. (2010) 'Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives: Synthesis Report', prepared for the Transparency and Accountability Initiative Workshop, Institute of Development Studies, 14–15 October 2010, IETASynthesisReportMcGeeGaventaFinal28Oct2010.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015)

Peixoto, T. (2013) 'The Uncertain Relationship between Open Data and Accountability: A Response to Yu and Robinson's "The New Ambiguity of Open Government" (No. ID 2264369)', UCLA Law Review,­open-data-and-accountability-a-response-to-yu-and-robinsons-the­new-ambiguity-of-open-government/ (accessed 15 December 2015)

Peixoto, T. and Fox, J. (2015) 'When Does ICT-enabled Citizen Voice Lead to Government Responsiveness?', Background Paper, 2016 World Development Report, World Bank Digital Engagement Evaluation Team, unpublished

Smith, M. and Reilly, K. (2013) Open Development: Networked Innovations in International Development, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, Resources/Publications/openebooks/541-1/index.html (accessed 16 December 2015)

Smith, M.; Engler, N.J.; Christian, G.; Diga, K.; Rashid, A. and Flynn-Dapaah, K. (2008) 'Open ICT4D: Working Draft', Draft.pdf (accessed 10 December 2015)

Suk Kim, P.; Halligan, J.; Cho, N.; Oh, C.H. and Eikenberry, A.M. (2005) 'Toward Participatory and Transparent Governance: Report on the Sixth Global Forum on Reinventing Govermment', Public Administration Review 65.6: 646–54, http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00494.x/abstract (accessed 16 December 2015)

Westhorp, G.; Walker, D.W.; Rogers, P.; Overbeeke, N.; Ball, D. and Brice, G. (2014) Enhancing Community Accountability, Empowerment and Education Outcomes in Low and Middle-income Countries: A Realist Review, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, outputs/SystematicReviews/Community-accountability-2014­Westhorp-report.pdf (accessed 16 December 2015)

von Lieres, B. and Piper, L. (2014) 'Mediated Citizenship', Palgrave Macmillan,­bettina-von-lieres/?isb=9781137405302 (accessed 14 December 2015)

Yu, H. and Robinson, D.G. (2012) 'The New Ambiguity of "Open Government" (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2012489)', UCLA Law Review,­%E2%80%9Copen-government%E2%80%9D/ (accessed 15 December 2015)