Building Disability-Inclusive Futures

Whilst significant progress has been made in recent years with regard to ensuring that development interventions are more inclusive, people with disabilities still remain underrepresented in development programmes and research. The landmark adoption of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2006 changed how disability is considered within society, as well as within the development sector. But there is still so much to do before all interventions are meaningfully inclusive of people with disabilities. 

This issue of the IDS Bulletin presents a collection of articles written by researchers and practitioners involved in the UK aid-funded Disability Inclusive Development (DID) programme. In particular, the articles include a focus on three broad themes: strengthening the evidence base; cross-cutting issues relevant to disability-inclusive development; and the central role of Organisations of Persons with Disabilities (OPDs). 

Drawing together key insights and lessons across the DID programme, the articles explore a range of topics relating to disability and development such as health, education, safeguarding, transport, stigma, the most marginalised groups, the imperative role of OPDs, and disability-inclusive approaches to research and evaluations. 

This is the first IDS Bulletin issue in its long history to have an explicit focus on disability.  

The editorial team are very proud of this thematic focus, believing that disability must be mainstreamed within development discourse, programming, and research if no one is to be left behind. We are also pleased to say, this IDS Bulletin is produced in an accessible format that goes beyond the expectations linked to current publishing legislation. 

Struggles for Justice in the Energy Transition: Views from the Front Lines

A critical issue of our time is how the world can transition from a development model based on the extraction and use of fossil fuels to one based on cleaner sources of energy, and how it does so in a just and inclusive way.

Central to this issue of the IDS Bulletin is the recognition that to be just, any transition must include consideration of the voices, knowledges, and realities of communities most affected. By bringing together authors from both the global South and the global North, covering a wide range of communities affected by different dimensions of the energy transition, we find long histories of action and resistance developed around encounters with earlier transitions.

The articles in this IDS Bulletin highlight cases of advocacy being used to strengthen community voices to make the processes of consultation more inclusive and empowering of marginalised perspectives. In doing so they also address a less well documented citizen-led pathway that focuses on bottom-up forms of action through grass-roots innovation and social movements.

Given the multiple historical forms of injustice which surround energy production, struggles for just transition must ultimately involve multiple forms of justice – be they distributive, recognitional, procedural, restorative, or reparative.

Democracy Contested

What has shifted us towards a more autocratic, rather than democratic, world?

While there is nothing new about a politically divided citizenry, the current state of democracy strongly calls for an analysis of the diverse motivations of citizens to vote for leaders and parties that have promised outright they would undo democratic institutions.

The articles in this issue of the IDS Bulletin look at how people engage with democracy – their basis for voting for certain leaders. The authors discuss the ideas and narratives that underlie the expectations citizens have of what these leaders would deliver in terms of redistribution to enhance the welfare and the recognition of their rights as the voting citizens, at the repudiation of the rights of others.

Democracy works where checks and balances through political, institutional, and social accountability institutions work. In liberal democracies, the judiciary is the first line of defence, but when autocrats come to power, they swiftly move to undermine an independent judiciary, concentrate powers in the hands of the executive, and constrain the media and other important freedoms.  The contributions in this IDS Bulletin highlight how this has unfolded in the US, India, the Philippines, Brazil, and across parts of Africa and Europe. In turn, they also provide insights into what can be done to halt and reverse these dynamics and address feelings of discontent by those who feel left behind by a lack of redistribution. How can left-wing and other political parties that aim to uphold inclusive democratic values reconnect with the constituencies they lost to parties with autocratic tendencies?